<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Doctrine &amp; Data</title>
    <link>https://reichert.law/blog/</link>
    <description>What large datasets and carefully checked AI show about how intellectual property doctrine works in practice, and how lawyers can use the same tools reliably.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <atom:link href="https://reichert.law/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Real Citations, Still Slop: A Florida Court Weighs In on Who Stands Behind an AI Filing</title>
      <link>https://reichert.law/blog/posts/florida-ai-slop-real-citations/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://reichert.law/blog/posts/florida-ai-slop-real-citations/</guid>
      <description>A Florida appeals court issued a show-cause order over filings it suspected were AI-generated. It identified no fake cases. The problem was the reasoning, and the court put responsibility on the lawyer who signed.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RiseandShine v. PepsiCo: The Supreme Court Takes Up Confusion</title>
      <link>https://reichert.law/blog/posts/riseandshine-v-pepsico-missing-jury/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://reichert.law/blog/posts/riseandshine-v-pepsico-missing-jury/</guid>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether trademark strength is a question of fact or law. My new essay measures the assumption beneath the question: juries decide about two percent of these cases.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>World Champ Tech v. Peloton: House Marks, App Stores, and the Quiet Power of Context</title>
      <link>https://reichert.law/blog/posts/world-champ-tech-peloton-house-marks/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://reichert.law/blog/posts/world-champ-tech-peloton-house-marks/</guid>
      <description>How the Ninth Circuit's app-store context reframed a house-mark issue in a reverse-confusion case, and why the cert petition cited my DuPont research.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Welcome to Doctrine &amp; Data</title>
      <link>https://reichert.law/blog/posts/welcome/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://reichert.law/blog/posts/welcome/</guid>
      <description>What this blog covers: trademark doctrine measured at scale, empirical legal studies, and how lawyers can use AI reliably.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
